MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4395694247 · doi:10.7759/cureus.59105

Malignant Gastrointestinal Neuroectodermal Tumor (GNET) Mimicking Small Bowel Lymphoma: A Case Report

2024· article· en· W4395694247 on OpenAlexaff
Yong Jia, Yi Yan, Pamela Hebbard, Gregory J. Garvin, Miao Lu

Bibliographic record

VenueCureus · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeurofibromatosis and Schwannoma Cases
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaUniversity of WinnipegSt Joseph's Health Care
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineLymphomaPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A malignant gastrointestinal neuroectodermal tumor (GNET) is a rare entity, characterized as a malignant mesenchymal neoplasm occurring exclusively near the gastrointestinal tract, prone to frequent local recurrence and metastasis. Here, we report a case of a 49-year-old male presented with abdominal pain and weight loss. The patient had a remote history of thymic B-cell lymphoma. An abdominal computed tomography (CT) scan revealed a focal wall thickening of the terminal ileum with mesenteric lymphadenopathy, suggestive of lymphoma. A core needle biopsy of the mesenteric node was inconclusive. A right hemicolectomy was subsequently performed. Histologically, abundant multinucleated osteoclast-like giant cells are present. The tumor cells show diffuse strong positivity for S100 and SOX10. EWSR1-ATF1 gene fusion was identified by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), consistent with a diagnosis of GNET. This case emphasizes a diagnostic challenge of a rare malignancy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0040.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCureusSame topicNeurofibromatosis and Schwannoma CasesFrench-language works237,207