MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4395704285 · doi:10.1093/oep/gpae015

Welfare-maximizing patent length in a dynamic general equilibrium model

2024· article· en· W4395704285 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Tatsuro Iwaisako

Bibliographic record

VenueOxford Economic Papers · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicIntellectual Property and Patents
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceInstitute of Social and Economic Research, Memorial University of NewfoundlandJapan Center for Economic Research
KeywordsGeneral equilibrium theoryDynamic equilibriumEconomicsWelfareMathematical economicsMicroeconomicsThermodynamicsPhysicsMarket economy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This article examines analytically the welfare-maximizing patent length in a dynamic general equilibrium model which is based on a variety expansion R&D-based growth model. The results show that if the elasticity of substitution among the intermediate goods is higher, that is, the price elasticity of demand is higher, the welfare-maximizing patent length is shorter. This article also examines the welfare-maximizing mix of patent length and breadth, and numerically obtains similar results, that is, a higher elasticity of substitution shortens the welfare-maximizing length.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.029

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.079
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.142 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOxford Economic PapersSame topicIntellectual Property and PatentsFrench-language works237,207