MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4395954345 · doi:10.1101/2024.04.25.590943

Resource competition affects the developmental outcome of the acoustic parasitoid fly <i>Ormia ochracea</i>

2024· preprint· en· W4395954345 on OpenAlexafffund
Jimena A. Dominguez, Brendan Latham, Laura C. Mongui, Addie Rossinow, Yeng Xiong, Briella V. Schmidt, Quang C. Vu, Blanca L. Torres-Lopez, Parker Allen Henderson, Andrew C. Mason, Norman Lee

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2024
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicInsect behavior and control techniques
Canadian institutionsThe Scarborough HospitalUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMitacsSt. Olaf CollegeUK Research and InnovationNational Science Foundation
KeywordsParasitoidCompetition (biology)Outcome (game theory)BiologyZoologyEcologyEconomicsMicroeconomicsHymenoptera

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Ormia ochracea is an acoustic parasitoid fly where the adults are free-living, but their larval young depend on nutritional resources within host crickets for growth and development. In nature, gravid female flies rely on their ability to recognize and localize cricket calling songs to find suitable host species to parasitize. In depth investigations of fly behavior and the mechanistic bases of auditory perception require a reliable approach to propagate stable fly colonies in the laboratory. Previous work has demonstrated that flies can be propagated using a number of natural host cricket species, as well as cricket species that flies do not parasitize in nature. However, we lack a complete understanding of fly developmental outcomes when non-host cricket species are utilized to propagate fly colonies. In this study, we document the feasibility of using commercially supplied Acheta domesticus as a host species. We specifically test the hypothesis that host size and resource competition can affect developmental outcomes of O. ochracea . We performed manual parasitizations on crickets that varied in size, and resource competition was varied by manipulating the number of larvae used to parasitize a host cricket. A series of morphometric analyses were conducted on host crickets, and developmental outcomes were measured in terms of pupation success and eclosion success, pupal width, and eclosed adult fly size. In the absence of resource competition, we found that host cricket size did not affect pupation or eclosion success. In the presence of resource competition between two developing larvae within a host cricket, pupation and eclosion successes were impacted negatively, and the developing pupae were more likely to be smaller. These results confirm that resource competition among developing parasitoids can negatively affect developmental outcomes, and Acheta domesticus can be used effectively to propagate colonies of O. ochracea in the laboratory. Highlights The acoustic parasitoid fly Ormia ochracea can successfully develop within the house cricket Acheta domesticus . Pupal size and eclosed adult fly size varies positively with the size of host cricket. Resource competition negatively affects pupation and eclosion success. Resource competition resulted in smaller fly pupae that were less likely to eclose. Graphical Abstract

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicInsect behavior and control techniquesFrench-language works237,207