Birth of protein-coding exons by ancient domestication of LINE retrotransposon
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Transposons, occasionally domesticated as novel host protein-coding genes, are responsible for the lineage-specific functions in vertebrates. LINE-1 (L1) is one of the most active transposons in the vertebrate genomes. Despite its abundance, the contribution of L1 to the birth of vertebrate proteins remains unelucidated. Here, we present a novel mechanism for the origination of de novo proteins, in which the L1 retrotransposons are incorporated into host genes as protein-coding exons by alternative splicing. L1 ORF1 protein (ORF1p) is an RNA-binding protein that binds to L1 RNA and is required for retrotransposition by acting as an RNA chaperone. We identified a splicing variant of myosin light chain 4 ( MYL4 ) containing an L1 ORF1-derived exon and encoding a chimeric protein of L1 ORF1p and MYL4, named Lyosin. Molecular evolutionary analysis revealed that Lyosin was acquired in the common ancestor of reptiles and birds during the Paleozoic era. The amino acid sequence of Lyosin had undergone purifying selection although it was lost in some lineages, including the Neognathae birds and snakes. The transcripts encoding Lyosin were expressed in the testes of two lizard species, suggesting that its function is different from that of the canonical MYL4 expressed specifically in the heart. Furthermore, sequence searches revealed other evolutionarily conserved chimeric isoforms fused to the L1 ORF1p in three genes in vertebrates. Our findings suggest a novel evolutionary mechanism for the birth of lineage-specific proteins derived from transposons and implicate the previously unrecognized adaptive functions of L1 ORF1p.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".