Assessing the Role of Local Sasi Practices in Environmental Conservation and Community Economic Empowerment in Maluku, Indonesia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The problem of this research is how Sasi can be applied properly to preserve resources and its impact on the community's economy.The Sasi is a tradition carried out by the Maluku people with the main aim of preserving resources.The Sasi tradition is a culture from Maluku that was inherited by the ancestors of the Maluku people for centuries.The Sasi culture is carried out because of two principles, namely that natural products must not be enjoyed for a certain period of time that are not yet suitable for use and to provide satisfaction from the results of one's own efforts.This research assessing the role of local Sasi practices in environmental conservation and community economic empowerment.The research was carried out in Seith Village and Rutong Village, Ambon Island in July-August 2022.These locations were selected through purposive sampling since the implementation protects agricultural and fishery resources.Furthermore, a sample of 80 individuals was selected using simple random sampling methods.The results showed that Sasi embodied significant philosophical values such as trust, excellent/mutual collaboration, colalboration betwen the vilage government, church, mosque and society, moral and ethical values to sustain the existing natural resources and prevent extinction, and the principle of not stealing the property of others.In addition, the analysis indicated moderate values of R 2 at 0.408, 0.616, and 0.564 for the different parameters.The coefficients for the variables of BS to EP, BS to CEI, and SM to EP showed significant values since the p-value was less than 0.05.Conversely, the coefficients of SM to CEI and EP to CEI indicated no significant effect, with p-values greater than 0.05.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".