MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4395958516 · doi:10.1093/mnras/stae1129

Time-varying double-peaked emission lines following the sudden ignition of the dormant galactic nucleus AT2017bcc

2024· article· en· W4395958516 on OpenAlexfundno aff
E. J. Ridley, M. Nicholl, C. A. Ward, P. K. Blanchard, R. Chornock, M. Fraser, Sandra Patricia Montenegro Gómez, S. Mattila, S. R. Oates, G. Pratten, Jessie C. Runnoe, P. Schmidt, K. D. Alexander, M. Gromadzki, A. Lawrence, T. Reynolds, K. Smith, Ł. Wyrzykowski, A. Aamer, J. P. Anderson, S. Benetti, E. Berger, K. C. Chambers, Hua Gao, C. P. Gutiérrez, C. Inserra, T. Kangas, G. Leloudas, E. A. Magnier, L. Makrygianni, T. Moore, T. E. Müller-Bravo, S. J. Smartt, K. V. Sokolovsky, R. J. Wainscoat, D. R. Young

Bibliographic record

VenueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAgencia Estatal de InvestigaciónHorizon 2020Japan Society for the Promotion of ScienceEuropean Research CouncilScience and Technology Facilities CouncilNational Science and Technology CouncilMinistry of Science and ICT, South KoreaAgencia Nacional de Investigación y DesarrolloGeneralitat de CatalunyaIstituto Nazionale di Fisica NucleareCentre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le DéveloppementDartmouth CollegeCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueNuclear Safety and Security CommissionEuropean CommissionMinisterio de Ciencia e InnovaciónSuomalainen TiedeakatemiaMinistry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and TechnologyOhio State UniversityUK Space AgencyNational Research FoundationAcademia SinicaScience Foundation IrelandNational Science FoundationRoyal SocietyNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationCanada Foundation for InnovationNational Radio Astronomy ObservatorySpace Telescope Science InstituteVillum Fonden
KeywordsPhysicsAstrophysicsNucleusAstronomyIgnition systemMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT We present a pan-chromatic study of AT2017bcc, a nuclear transient that was discovered in 2017 within the skymap of a reported burst-like gravitational-wave candidate, G274296. It was initially classified as a superluminous supernova, and then reclassified as a candidate tidal disruption event. Its optical light curve has since shown ongoing variability with a structure function consistent with that of an active galactic nucleus, however, earlier data show no variability for at least 10 yr prior to the outburst in 2017. The spectrum shows complex profiles in the broad Balmer lines: a central component with a broad-blue wing, and a boxy component with time-variable blue and red shoulders. The H α emission profile is well modelled using a circular accretion disc component, and a blue-shifted double Gaussian which may indicate a partially obscured outflow. Weak narrow lines, together with the previously flat light curve, suggest that this object represents a dormant galactic nucleus which has recently been re-activated. Our time-series modelling of the Balmer lines suggests that this is connected to a disturbance in the disc morphology, and we speculate this could involve a sudden violent event such as a tidal disruption event involving the central supermassive black hole, though this cannot be confirmed, and given an estimated black hole mass of ≳ 107–108 M⊙ instabilities in an existing disc may be more likely. Although we find that the redshifts of AT2017bcc (z = 0.13) and G274296 (z > 0.42) are inconsistent, this event adds to the growing diversity of both nuclear transients and multimessenger contaminants.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society→Same topicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena→French-language works237,207→