<i>APOE3</i> - <i>R136S</i> mutation confers resilience against tau pathology via cGAS-STING-IFN inhibition
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Summary The Christchurch mutation (R136S) on the APOE3 ( E3 S/S ) gene is associated with attenuation of tau load and cognitive decline despite the presence of a causal PSEN1 mutation and high levels of amyloid beta pathology in the carrier 1 . However, the specific molecular mechanisms enabling the E3 S/S mutation to mitigate tau-induced neurodegeneration remain unclear. Here, we replaced mouse ApoE with wild-type human E3 or E3 S/S on a tauopathy background. The R136S mutation markedly decreased tau load and protected against tau-induced synaptic loss, myelin loss, and reduction in theta and gamma powers. Additionally, the R136S mutation reduced interferon response to tau pathology in both mouse and human microglia, suppressing cGAS-STING activation. Treating tauopathy mice carrying wild-type E3 with a cGAS inhibitor protected against tau-induced synaptic loss and induced similar transcriptomic alterations to those induced by the R136S mutation across brain cell types. Thus, suppression of microglial cGAS-STING-IFN pathway plays a central role in mediating the protective effects of R136S against tauopathy. One-sentence summary The R136S mutation on APOE3 enhances resistance to tau-related pathology and toxicity by downregulating the cGAS-STING-IFN signaling pathway.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".