MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4395961797 · doi:10.18280/jesa.570217

Enhancing Wind Energy Conversion System Performance via Sliding Mode Control and Parameter Estimation with PI-MRAS

2024· article· en· W4395961797 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
R. Behloul, Lakhdar Mazouz, Mohamed Boudiaf, F.E. Benmohamed

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal Européen des Systèmes Automatisés · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWind Turbine Control Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMRASControl theory (sociology)Mode (computer interface)Estimation theoryWind powerEnergy (signal processing)PiComputer scienceVector controlControl (management)EngineeringMathematicsVoltageElectrical engineeringAlgorithmStatisticsArtificial intelligenceInduction motor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of this paper is to investigate a wind power system utilizing a doubly fed induction generator (DFIG).In this configuration, the stator is directly connected to the grid, while the rotor is linked to the grid via a back-to-back converter.The primary aim is to develop a decoupled control system for the DFIG to improve power quality.To achieve this goal, we introduce a robust control technique as a means to control the reactive and active power of DFIG.This technique is known as sliding mode control.Furthermore, we propose a model-reference adaptive system estimator based on proportional and integral controllers (PI-MRAS) for sensor-less control of DFIG.This estimator is designed to accurately approximate the rotor resistance.The proposed control strategies enhance the performance of the wind energy conversion system, particularly considering variations in the machine's parameters.Simulation results demonstrate the high performance and robustness of control strategies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.450
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal Européen des Systèmes AutomatisésSame topicWind Turbine Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207