MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4396213980 · doi:10.2316/j.2023.203-0455

A NEW ADAPTIVE UNDER-FREQUENCY LOAD SHEDDING SCHEME FOR MULTI-AREA POWER SYSTEM, 1-10.

2023· article· en· W4396213980 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ahmed Tiguercha, Ahmed Amine Ladjici, Souheil Saboune

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Power and Energy Systems · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHVDC Systems and Fault Protection
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLoad SheddingScheme (mathematics)Power (physics)Computer scienceElectric power systemControl theory (sociology)Electronic engineeringEngineeringMathematicsPhysicsControl (management)Artificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Under-frequency load shedding (UFLS) is a critical function of frequency control in a power system.This paper presents a new adaptive UFLS scheme in multi-area power systems, where the frequency thresholds and load to be shed are adapted to the severity of the disturbance in each control area.In this approach, the frequency thresholds are adapted by a fuzzy logic controller using the rate of change of frequency (RoCoF), the tie-line transit, the amount of load to be shed is estimated according to the available tie-line capacity and spinning reserve.The objective is to avoid the collapse of the power system following a major disturbance, by shedding a sufficient amount of load while avoiding the tripping of the tie-lines.Numerical simulations are performed on the multi-area Algerian transmission power system and used to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach compared to the conventional and adaptive approaches.The results show the effectiveness of the proposed approach, with a better quality of frequency control by adapting the amount of load shedding to the severity of the disturbance, and ensuring a better stability of the system by avoiding tripping of the tie-lines.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.979
Threshold uncertainty score0.645

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Power and Energy SystemsSame topicHVDC Systems and Fault ProtectionFrench-language works237,207