MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4396214875 · doi:10.1109/tce.2023.3347456

Guest Editorial Special Section on Security, Privacy and Trust for Consumer Smart Devices

2024· editorial· en· W4396214875 on OpenAlex
Weizhi Meng, Rongxing Lu, Jun Zhang, Pierangela Samarati

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics · 2024
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicIoT and Edge/Fog Computing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInternet of ThingsConsumer privacyContext (archaeology)ElectronicsInternet privacyComputer securityComputer scienceThe InternetSection (typography)Information privacyTelecommunicationsWorld Wide WebBusinessEngineeringAdvertisingElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Currently, smart devices such as smartphones have become common and essential in our daily lives, which provide many new intelligent services. For example, consumers will use their smart devices for online purchase and personal data storage. In the context of Internet-of-Things (IoT), smartphones and household appliances can be seen as sensor nodes and compose sensor networks for measuring environmental parameters and generating user interaction data. These connections also offer novel use cases and customized experiences that are attractive to both manufacturers and consumers. The consumer electronics market is predicted to reach at a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 5.2% from 2023–2033.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.049
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it