MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The behavior of Fe isotopes in Fe skarns: A case study from the Yeshan Fe skarn deposit, Eastern China

2024· article· en· W4396217630 on OpenAlexaff
Shugao Zhao, Matthew J. Brzozowski, Weiqiang Li

Bibliographic record

VenueOre Geology Reviews · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsGeological Survey of Canada
FundersNanjing UniversityNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsSkarnGeologyGeochemistryChinaIsotopeSeismologyArchaeologyFluid inclusionsHydrothermal circulationGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

• The δ 56 Fe values exhibit a narrow variation in different skarn zones, particularly in garnet endoskarn and garnet exoskarn. • The δ 56 Fe values of garnet and garnet-diopside skarn are mainly controlled by mineralogy, with garnet skarn having higher δ 56 Fe values than garnet-diopside skarn. • Skarn garnet could record the δ 56 Fe values of hydrothermal fluids. To characterize the applicability of Fe isotopes to skarn petrogenesis and exploration, a robust understanding of their fractionation behavior during skarn alteration and mineralization is required. Here, we characterize the bulk-rock Fe isotope composition of endo- and exoskarn, magnetite ore, and the intrusive rocks that comprise the Yeshan Fe skarn deposit in Eastern China, aiming at better constraining the behavior of Fe isotopes during skarn formation and mineralization. The δ 56 Fe values of garnet and garnet–diopside skarn (–0.19 ‰ to 0.15 ‰, n = 15) are negatively correlated with bulk-rock MgO/Al 2 O 3 , suggesting that the variation in δ 56 Fe of these samples is mainly controlled by mineralogy. Garnet skarn is characterized by δ 56 Fe values (0.07 ‰ to 0.15 ‰, n = 11) that are similar to those of the spatially associated quartz monzonite pluton (0.12 ‰ to 0.16 ‰, n = 2), and it has systematically higher Fe 2 O 3 contents. Based on petrological observations and bulk-rock geochemistry (e.g., REE and P 2 O 5 contents), garnet, the main Fe-bearing mineral in the garnet skarn, is inferred to have achieved equilibrium (or near equilibrium) with the hydrothermal fluids that circulated throughout the mineralized system, implying that the δ 56 Fe values of garnet skarn can be used to trace the δ 56 Fe values of the fluids. Epidote skarn has a similar Fe 2 O 3 content as garnet skarn, but lower δ 56 Fe values (–0.07 ‰ to 0.01 ‰, n = 2). Epidote skarn was genetically associated with low temperature, FeCl 2 (H 2 O) 4 -dominated fluids, which are in contrast with that (high-temperature, [FeCl 4 ] 2- -dominated fluids) formed the garnet skarn. Iron in diopside skarn is mainly hosted by magnetite; the δ 56 Fe values of this lithology (0.00 ‰ to 0.12 ‰, n = 2) are, therefore, mainly controlled by magnetite. Taken together, the Fe isotopic signatures of various types of skarn at Yeshan could enhance our understanding of skarn deposits worldwide, especially those sharing geological features similar to the Yeshan Fe skarn deposit.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.193
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOre Geology ReviewsSame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207