MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4396219025 · doi:10.1101/2024.04.26.591305

Genetically encoded reporters of actin filament organization in living cells and tissues

2024· preprint· en· W4396219025 on OpenAlexaff
Carla Silva Martins, François Iv, Shashi Kumar Suman, Thomas C. Panagiotou, Clara Sidor, María Ruso-López, Camille N. Plancke, Shizue Omi, Rebecca Pagès, Laurie Ramond, Federica Arbizzani, Caio Vaz Rimoli, Frank Schnorrer, François Robin, Loïc LeGoff, J.D. Pédelacq, Antoine Jégou, Stéphanie Cabantous, Manos Mavrakis

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2024
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCellular Mechanics and Interactions
Canadian institutionsCanada Research ChairsUniversity of Toronto
FundersAgence Nationale de la Recherche
KeywordsProtein filamentCell biologyActinGenetically engineeredGenetically modified organismBiologyGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

SUMMARY The cytoskeletal protein actin is crucial for cell shape and integrity throughout eukaryotes. Actin filaments perform essential biological functions, including muscle contraction, cell division and tissue morphogenesis. These diverse activities are achieved through the ability of actin filaments to be arranged into precise architectures. Much progress has been made in defining the proteome of the actin cytoskeleton, but a detailed appreciation of the dynamic organizational state of the actin filaments themselves has been hindered by available tools. Fluorescence polarization microscopy is uniquely placed for measuring actin filament organization by exploiting the sensitivity of polarized light excitation to the orientation of fluorophores attached to actin filaments. By engineering fusions of five widely used actin localization reporters to fluorescent proteins with constrained mobility, we have succeeded in developing genetically-encoded, green- and red-fluorescent-protein-based reporters for non-invasive, quantitative measurements of actin filament organization in living cells and tissues by fluorescence polarization microscopy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicCellular Mechanics and InteractionsFrench-language works237,207