MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Roswell: Communicating Fact and Fiction in Popular Culture

2008· article· en· W4396223066 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Joey Skidmore

Bibliographic record

VenuePopular Culture Review · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMedia Studies and Communication
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPopular cultureArtLiterature

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In recent decades the American people have become more cynical about, and more skeptical of, official government statements, and the elected officials' honorable intentions.Thanks to Watergate, the Iran-Contra affair, former President Clinton's various scandals, the Bush administration's assertions of "weapons of mass destruction" as a justification for pre-emptive war, and general comments from officials regarding the outcome in Iraq the public may have good reason to be suspicious-and even a little paranoid-of the government and the military.Scandals, cover-ups, and even conspiracies, no longer shock the jaded American public.This brings us to what some conspiracy buffs allege, and much of popular culture assumes, to be the greatest conspiracy and cover-up in American history: the Roswell Incident.According to Time Magazine, the Roswell Incident is the only time that the U.S. government has (intentionally) gone on record as saying UFOs really exist (Time, 1997).Author Charles B. Moore notes that UFO was not always synonymous for extraterrestrial.At one time it simply referred to something observed in the sky that was not a known phenomenon or conventional aircraft.But by the time the Roswell Incident hit the papers, UFO was a common "buzz-word" for flying disc (containing alien visitors).Roswell, New Mexico is a small city of about 49,000.It once housed a military air base, is the birthplace of Demi Moore, and also boasts the world's largest Mozzarella plant.A nearby town is somewhat famous for its lizard races.But Roswell has them beaten, hands down.Tourists come from all over the world to visit the UFO Museum, and the site of the famous 1947 "crash landing."Any researcher attempting a sober study of the UFO phenomenon faces a daunting task.The difficulty arises not only from the incredible amount of material pertaining to UFOs, but also that it is all incredibly one-sidedespecially when it pertains to the Roswell Incident.Most of those who have written about this have done so with a very clear agenda: either to prove that the aliens crash-landed on US soil, or to disprove this, dispelling all notions of extraterrestrial visitors, and pooh-poohing all reports of UFOs as ludicrous and wacko.The vast majority of this material seems to be written either by dyed-inthe-wool true believers who will go to any great length to argue their point and make converts, or by narrow-minded skeptical scientists and others determined to debunk the "UFO myth."Some of the latter may be guilty of harboring ulterior motives.Everybody seems to agree on one thing: something plummeted to Earth near Roswell, New Mexico in June of 1947.Cattle rancher W.W. "Mac" Brazel stumbled onto the strange debris at the Foster Ranch (85 miles northwest of

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.031
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score0.115

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.031
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0050.006
Science and technology studies0.0160.017
Scholarly communication0.0180.018
Open science0.0010.007
Research integrity0.0050.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0340.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.078
GPT teacher head0.357
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePopular Culture ReviewSame topicMedia Studies and CommunicationFrench-language works237,207