Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Climate change causing extreme weather events across the world. The excising urban drainage system facing the great stress of managing heavy precipitation events and caused urban flooding. The specialists in the urban designing field are searching for more effective way of managing flooding events. Sustainable Urban Drainage System is kind of drainage system design which simulating nature rainwater managing practices. In this research, the SUDS is analyzed mainly from three aspects: Flood managing ability, economic benefits, and ecological benefits. This research reviews the existing SUDS examples and research basing on the SUDS designing strategies. Research has found that the SUDS is more than capable of managing stormwater but also can generate both monetary and indirect economic benefit. Furthermore, the nature feature of SUDS facilities can provide ecological benefits like providing habitats for animals, improving hydrological feature, and increase comfortability for residents. Thus, SUDS can be an ideal solution for the new urban drainage systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it