Impact of CuCl2 Addition to PMMA Polymer on Structural and Optical Properties
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pure and CuCl2 Poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) films have been prepared by the solution cast method.The morphology of the films was investigated by atomic force microscopy (AFM).The roughness, grain size, and average diameter of the pure and doped samples vary between an increase and a decrease with an increase the doping concentration.The root mean square (RMS) roughness of the dope of copper nanoparticle CuCl2 on the PMMA polymer was studied from 3D AFM images,increases from (5.27) nm to (10.42) nm.The homogeneity of the surface grains rises with the inuction in the value of the roughness rate with an increase in the dope.The optical characteristics of the polymer films were analyzed in the (200-1200) nm wavelength range.The transmittance, absorption coefficient, band gap, and Urbach have been estimated.The value of the energy band gap was 3.72 eV for an an undoped sample and it has been decreased to be (3.3,3.23, and 3.19) eV for (1%, 2% and 3%) of the doping ratio of CuCl2 while Urbach energy was increased after dopping.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it