Hypotony and Anterior Uveitis following Dual Therapy with Nivolumab and Ipilimumab for Metastatic Melanoma: A Case Report
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Purpose: To describe a rare case of hypotony and anterior uveitis following dual therapy with nivolumab and ipilimumab for metastatic melanoma. Methods: Case report. Results: Here, we present the case of a 64-year-old man taking nivolumab and ipilimumab dual therapy for BRAF+ (v-raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B1) metastatic melanoma. After treatment for 3 months, he presented to the ophthalmology clinic with bilateral intraocular pressures of 1 mmHg, bilateral keratic precipitates, cataracts, posterior synechiae, and anterior chamber inflammation. He improved with topical medications and the cessation of immunotherapy. Conclusions: Immunotherapies are a novel class of chemotherapy that has increased in prevalence for the treatment of numerous malignancies. There are many rare complications from these medications that are sparsely reported. Knowledge of ocular hypotony as a potential consequence of nivolumab and ipilimumab is important, particularly as it may arise months after treatment initiation and necessitate immunotherapy cessation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".