Optimalisasi Laboratorium Terpadu Guna Mendukung Kuliah Penelitian dan Kuliah Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Dengan Introduksi PIOS-RT
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tujuan pengabdian ini adalah (i) penataan administrasi dan (ii) program aksi pendampingan melakukan demoplot pada tanaman singkong, dan cabe melalui program kuliah pengabdian kepada masyarakat (KPM) mahasiswa Universitas Widyagama (UWG) Malang 2024 melalui ‘prototipe iptek olah sampah rumah tangga (‘PIOS-RT’)’. Metode yang dipakai adalah ekperimen dengan analisis before-after (BA).Hasil pengabdian menjukkan (i) penataan administrasi dilakukan secara baik. Indikator baik adalah terjadinya kesepakatan (agreement) antara fihak penanggungjawab PAUD Al-Qur’an Darussalam maupun Direktur Laboratorium terpadu (integrated laboratory, iL). Hal ini dapat dipakai sebagai ukuran (measure) ketercapaiannya Tingkat optimal dan (ii) program aksi pendampingan melakukan demoplot pada tanaman singkong, dan cabe melalui program kuliah pengabdian kepada masyarakat (KPM) mahasiswa Universitas Widyagama (UWG) Malang 2024. Namun demikian kelemahan pelaksanaan program ke-2 ini adalah tidak cukupnya waktu sampai mengetahui hasil dampak penggunaan pupuk komposnya, sehingga secara informal dilakukan beberapa peserta KPM menindaklanjuti hingga kompos siap diintruduksi pada singkong dan cabe.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.012 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".