Stratégies à déployer par les étudiants en situation de handicap en stage et accompagnement souhaité
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les universités connaissent une hausse d’étudiants en situation de handicap (ESH) qui suscite des questions concernant l’accompagnement à leur offrir en stage. Cette recherche collaborative leur donne une voix afin qu’ils puissent : 1) identifier leurs principaux défis rencontrés en stage, 2) répertorier leurs stratégies d’apprentissage pour composer avec leurs défis et 3) identifier les mesures d’accompagnement souhaitées de la part des formateurs de stage. Un processus itératif de collecte et d’analyse de données, comportant questionnaire et groupes de discussion, suggère que les ESH souhaitent ardemment réussir en déployant différentes stratégies tout en étant accompagnés par des formateurs disposés à les accueillir dans leur altérité.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.012 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it