Drone-based mixed reality: enhancing visualization for large-scale outdoor simulations with dynamic viewpoint adaptation using vision-based pose estimation methods
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In recent years, there has been a growing interest in the integration of drones across diverse sectors, particularly within architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC). The amalgamation of drones with mixed reality (MR) stands out as a promising avenue. Proposed applications include the comparison of design and actual objects, as well as landscape simulation in urban design. A previous study successfully developed a drone-viewpoint MR system with low model dependence, leveraging general drones and methods. However, the alignment between the real and virtual worlds was contingent on predefined flight routes, limiting adaptability during MR execution. This study introduces a new model-independent drone viewpoint MR system that integrates two vision-based attitude estimation methods, enabling execution on arbitrary flight paths. Evaluation of the prototype for system latency and alignment accuracy revealed an overall latency of 3.5 s. The alignment accuracy, assessed using intersection over union, demonstrated performance equal to or surpassing the previous system. While this paper does not showcase MR content for practical use, the research lays the groundwork for advancing drone applications in the AEC field. The proposed system offers versatility for MR applications across various stages, from design to maintenance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it