MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4396238149 · doi:10.18280/rcma.340214

Enhancement of Mechanical Properties in Copper Matrix Composites Through Cold and Hot Powder Compaction Techniques

2024· article· fr· W4396238149 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Abdulhaqq A. Hamid, Hazim Abed Mohammed Al-JEWAREE

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue des composites et des matériaux avancés · 2024
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldEngineering
TopicAluminum Alloys Composites Properties
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of Mosul
KeywordsCompactionComposite materialMaterials scienceCopperMatrix (chemical analysis)Metallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Particulate Copper Matrix Composites (PCMCs.)are a class of advanced materials that combine copper as the matrix material with a dispersion of particles.These PCMCs.exhibit excellent wear resistance, machinability, cold workability, fatigue resistance, and corrosion resistance, and are capable of operating under extremely harsh conditions.In the current study, ten distinct stoichiometric of PCMCs.were prepared by reinforcing a copper matrix (20 wt.% Cu) with two types of reinforcing particles (namely: CuO and Al2O3) in order to produce particulate composite (Cu-CuO-Al2O3 system).According to the sequence, these samples were subjected to two thermal processes.In the first heat treatment, the samples were exposed to 900 for sixty minutes.Then, we subject these samples to a second heat treatment at 1150 for 15 minutes.Following each heat treatment, microhardness, diametral compression, and estimated tensile strength were measured.It was found that at cold compaction, the estimated tensile strength, diametral compression strength, and microhardness increase with increasing the weight percentage of aluminum oxide powder and decrease with the weight percentage of CuO powder at constant (20 wt.%) of Cu powder for our composite system.When cold compacted with composite (Cu-CuO-Al2O3) powders with a 50 wt.% addition of alumina (Al2O3), the results indicate that a specimen possesses good mechanical properties, including microhardness, surface roughness, tensile strength, and diametral compression strength.It is found that at hot compaction, the tensile strength, diametral compression, and microhardness increase with increasing a percentage of aluminum oxide rather than the copper oxide powder at constant copper powder for the composite system used.The specimen C10, (20% Cu, 30% CuO, and 50% Al2O3), had superior mechanical properties to the other samples after the initial heat treatment.Nonetheless, a second heat treatment revealed that the specimen C7, (20% Cu, 45% CuO, and 35% Al2O3), has a higher value for mechanical properties and a low compact density.Taking into account the aforementioned factors, it was determined from the experimental results that the tensile strength and microhardness, increased during fusion for both types of reinforcing materials used in composite powders.This property improved as the percentage of copper and copper oxide powders increased during hot compaction at temperatures above 1100.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.197
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue des composites et des matériaux avancésSame topicAluminum Alloys Composites PropertiesFrench-language works237,207