Striatal Functional Hypoconnectivity in Patients With Schizophrenia Suffering From Negative Symptoms, Longitudinal Findings
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Negative symptoms in schizophrenia (SZ), such as apathy and diminished expression, have limited treatments and significantly impact daily life. Our study focuses on the functional division of the striatum: limbic-motivation and reward, associative-cognition, and sensorimotor-sensory and motor processing, aiming to identify potential biomarkers for negative symptoms. STUDY DESIGN: This longitudinal, 2-center resting-state-fMRI (rsfMRI) study examines striatal seeds-to-whole-brain functional connectivity. We examined connectivity aberrations in patients with schizophrenia (PwSZ), focusing on stable group differences across 2-time points using intra-class-correlation and associated these with negative symptoms and measures of cognition. Additionally, in PwSZ, we used negative symptoms to predict striatal connectivity aberrations at the baseline and used the striatal aberration to predict symptoms 9 months later. STUDY RESULTS: A total of 143 participants (77 PwSZ, 66 controls) from 2 centers (Berlin/Geneva) participated. We found sensorimotor-striatum and associative-striatum hypoconnectivity. We identified 4 stable hypoconnectivity findings over 3 months, revealing striatal-fronto-parietal-cerebellar hypoconnectivity in PwSZ. From those findings, we found hypoconnectivity in the bilateral associative striatum with the bilateral paracingulate-gyrus and the anterior cingulate cortex in PwSZ. Additionally, hypoconnectivity between the associative striatum and the superior frontal gyrus was associated with lower cognition scores in PwSZ, and weaker sensorimotor striatum connectivity with the superior parietal lobule correlated negatively with diminished expression and could predict symptom severity 9 months later. CONCLUSIONS: Importantly, patterns of weaker sensorimotor striatum and superior parietal lobule connectivity fulfilled the biomarker criteria: clinical significance, reflecting underlying pathophysiology, and stability across time and centers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".