MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4396494542 · doi:10.18280/ts.410228

Advanced Age Group Estimation Using Gait Analysis: A Novel Multi-Energy Image and Invariant Moments Method

2024· article· en· W4396494542 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Nasser Al Musalhi, Erbuğ Çelebi

Bibliographic record

VenueTraitement du signal · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGait Recognition and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInvariant (physics)GaitGroup analysisEstimationGroup (periodic table)Artificial intelligenceComputer scienceMathematicsComputer visionPhysical medicine and rehabilitationMedicinePsychologyPhysicsEngineeringSocial psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The precise estimation of age is pivotal in identity verification across critical security checkpoints, including seaports, land borders, and airports.This study introduces an innovative methodology for age estimation based on gait analysis, enhancing security measures and providing reliable identity confirmation.Utilizing a novel preprocessing technique on gait datasets, this approach amalgamates three integral components: the Accumulated Frame Difference Energy Image (AFDEI), the Gait Energy Image (GEI), and the Invariant Moment of the image.These elements collectively facilitate the efficient extraction and analysis of critical gait data.Evaluation of the model, employing a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), was conducted on the publicly available OU-ISRI with age dataset.The model demonstrated remarkable proficiency, achieving an average accuracy of 90.40% across 14 distinct view angles within a 5 K-Fold framework.This methodological advancement significantly outperforms existing state-of-the-art techniques in accuracy.The findings highlight the efficacy and potential of the proposed method for age grouping estimation through human gait analysis.Despite these advancements, it is crucial to acknowledge the study's limitations, particularly the dependency on silhouette images.Preprocessing is essential prior to implementing the proposed methodology.The outcomes of this study are instrumental in reinforcing age estimation as a key factor in bolstering identity verification processes at essential security junctures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.754
Threshold uncertainty score0.781

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTraitement du signalSame topicGait Recognition and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207