Catalytic Activity of Porous Crystalline Aluminosilicates in Continuous Nitrate Removal via Electroreduction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Research & Development in Material Science Catalytic Activity of Porous Crystalline Aluminosilicates in Continuous Nitrate Removal via Electroreduction Ahmed Enmili1*, Frédéric Monette1, Nasreddine Bendib1, Abdelkrim Azzouz1,2* 1École de technologie supérieure, Montréal (Québec) H3C 1K3, Canada 2Université du Québec à Montréal, Montréal (Québec) H3C 3P8, Canada *Corresponding author:Abdelkrim Azzouz, École de Technologie Supérieure, Montréal (Québec) H3C 1K3, Canada Submission: November 21, 2023;Published: November 29, 2023 DOI: 10.31031/RDMS.2023.19.000970 ISSN: 2576-8840 Volume 19 Issue 4
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".