Developmental Dynamics of Human Cardiogenesis: A multi-omic reference and its disruption in Trisomy 21
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Developmental dynamics involve the specification of diverse cell types and their spatial organization into multicellular niches. Here, we combine single-cell and spatial multiomics to define 19 distinct tissue niches in the developing heart, leading to the development of a context-aware, resolution-agnostic niche classification tool ( TissueTypist ). Applying high-resolution spatial profiling to the developing sinoatrial node, we resolve three pacemaker cell subtypes arrayed along a linear axis. First trimester subpopulations, such as the pacemaker cells in the sinus horn and sinoatrial node head region, display neuro-attractant programmes and interact with parasympathetic neurons via interactions including Semaphorin-Plexin signalling. Temporal trajectories map maturation of atrial and ventricular cardiomyocytes, uncovering a lipid-metabolic switch and potential key regulators of cell type identity. In the ventricle, we identify cellular and transcriptional gradients along both pseudotime and transmural axes, offering new molecular insights into myocardial compaction and maturation. Comparative profiling of euploid and trisomy 21 hearts shows a depletion of compact cardiomyocytes and heightened apoptosis, validated in isogenic-matched trisomy 21 and euploid iPSC-derived cardiomyocytes. This implicates disrupted myocardial growth may be a mechanism for Down’s syndrome-associated congenital heart disease. Overall, we deliver a spatially resolved framework of human cardiac development, enabling systematic exploration of developmental niches in health and disease.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".