MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4396499179 · doi:10.1021/acschembio.4c00104

Pathogenic SNPs Affect Both RNA and DNA G-Quadruplexes’ Responses to Ligands

2024· article· en· W4396499179 on OpenAlexafffund
Marc-Antoine Turcotte, Jean‐Pierre Perreault

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Chemical Biology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologiesCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchUniversité de Sherbrooke
KeywordsSingle-nucleotide polymorphismGeneticsBiologyRNADNAGeneSNPPopulationComputational biologyGenotypeMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are common genetic variations that are present in over 1% of the population and can significantly modify the structures of both DNA and RNA. G-quadruplex structures (G4) are formed by the superposition of tetrads of guanines. To date, the impact of SNPs on both G4 ligands' binding efficacies and specificities has not been investigated. Here, using a bioinformatically predicted G4 and SNPs found in the α-synuclein gene as a proof-of-concept, it was demonstrated that SNPs can modulate both DNA and RNA G4s' responses to ligands. Specifically, six widely recognized ligands (Phen-DC3, PDS, 360A, RHPS4, BRACO19, and TMPyP4) were shown to differentially affect both the structure and the polymerase stalling of the different SNPs. This work highlights the importance of choosing the appropriate G4 ligand when dealing with an SNP identified in a G-rich gene.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.060
Threshold uncertainty score0.820

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACS Chemical BiologySame topicDNA and Nucleic Acid ChemistryFrench-language works237,207