Effectiveness of Bacillus genus application in the treatment of osteoarthritis by bioactive fish concentrate
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background. Understanding the impact of gut microbiota on the development of osteoarthritis (OA) and investigating the potential of probiotics as a treatment remain crucial areas of research. The study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of a Bacillus-based probiotic in combination with a bioactive marine fish concentrate for the OA treatment. Materials and methods. This study included 38 patients diagnosed with grade II knee OA. A structural-modifying drug containing 0.2 ml of bioactive concentrate derived from small marine fish, was administered every other day in a dose of 2.0 ml (10 intramuscular injections in total) for 21 days. Twenty patients (main group) additionally received a probiotic containing bacteria of the genus Bacillus (B.subtilis, B.licheniformis, B.amyloliquefaciens, B.megaterium, B.pumilus) in the dosage form of oral suspension daily for the entire treatment period of 21 days. Clinical efficacy was assessed by the Western Ontario McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), the questionnaire was completed by all patients before the study and after 3, 7, 14 and 21 days of the therapy. Results. The findings showed a significant reduction in pain by 40.6 % (p < 0.001), stiffness by 36.8 % (p < 0.001), and improvement in knee function by 26.6 % (p < 0.05) in the main group (undergoing combined therapy with bioactive fish concentrate and the probiotic) on the 7th day of treatment. In the comparison group, a decrease in pain by 27.4 % (p < 0.05), stiffness by 25.0 % (p < 0.05), and improvement in joint function by 28.9 % (p < 0.05) were observed only on the 14th day of therapy. Conclusions. It was demonstrated that administering a probiotic composition containing bacteria from the genus Bacillus enhances the efficacy of bioactive sea fish concentrate in treating OA. Reduction in pain, stiffness, and improvement in joint function can be observed as early as the 7th day after initiating their combined use. In contrast, when using the bioactive concentrate of marine fish alone, the clinical effect is typically observed by the 14th day of treatment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".