Soins de soutien au Nouveau-Brunswick (Canada) : analyse de l’environnement
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le diagnostic et le traitement du cancer laissent rarement les survivants et leurs proches physiquement et psychologiquement indemnes. Les services dont ils ont besoin dépassent le seul traitement médical, c’est-à-dire qu’il leur faut une variété de soins de soutien répondant à leurs besoins physiques, sociaux, informationnels et émotionnels. La présente étude a pour objectif de répertorier les services de soutien destinés aux survivants du cancer, aux membres de leur famille et à leurs proches aidants qui sont disponibles dans la province du Nouveau-Brunswick, au Canada. Pour ce faire, nous avons procédé à une analyse de l’environnement, ce qui nous a permis de constater que les services disponibles dans la province ne sont pas facilement repérables ou accessibles. On a observé tout particulièrement des lacunes dans les services aux survivants, à leur famille et à leurs proches, en phase post-traitement.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".