MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4396513703 · doi:10.1061/jbenf2.beeng-6236

Performance-Based Seismic Design for Retrofitting Deficient Bridge Bents: Developing Performance-Based Damage States

2024· article· en· W4396513703 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Bridge Engineering · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryOkanagan University CollegeUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRetrofittingBridge (graph theory)EngineeringSeismic retrofitStructural engineeringSeismic analysisStructural health monitoringForensic engineeringCivil engineeringConstruction engineeringReinforced concrete

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The performance-based seismic design (PBSD) approach is implemented to achieve the desired structural performance over a wide range of seismic hazard levels. It requires a set of targeted performance levels and their corresponding limits to be defined. Because the current codes and guidelines do not prescribe these limits for different performance levels for old bridges with seismic deficiencies, such as inadequate ductility and low shear strength, this study aims to develop them. In this study, quantitative damage states that are expressed as drifts and damage indices (DIs) at various performance levels are developed using incremental dynamic analyses for retrofitted bents. Four retrofit options: (1) steel; (2) carbon–fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP); (3) concrete; and (4) engineered cementitious composite (ECC) jackets are considered in this study. The concrete and longitudinal reinforcement of all bents cracked and yielded at limiting drifts of 0.06% and 0.38%, respectively. In addition, the ECC-jacketed bent experienced core crushing of the concrete at the highest limiting drift of 4.16%. In addition, a detailed example complements this study, which presents how retrofitting could be designed by considering the target seismic performance that uses the proposed damage states. The first-mode spectral accelerations of the bents were the optimum intensity measures (IMs) to study their relative performance for noncumulative and cumulative damage measures (DMs) at various hazard levels. Drift is considered noncumulative, and the DI that includes the combined effect of maximum drift and absorbed hysteretic energy is considered cumulative. The steel jacket was the most effective when decreasing the median maximum drift of the retrofitted bent, and the ECC jacket reduced the median DI of this type of bent the most.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.424
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it