A Deep Learning Framework for Analysis of the Eustachian Tube and the Internal Carotid Artery
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Obtaining automated, objective 3-dimensional (3D) models of the Eustachian tube (ET) and the internal carotid artery (ICA) from computed tomography (CT) scans could provide useful navigational and diagnostic information for ET pathologies and interventions. We aim to develop a deep learning (DL) pipeline to automatically segment the ET and ICA and use these segmentations to compute distances between these structures. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. SETTING: Tertiary referral center. METHODS: From a database of 30 CT scans, 60 ET and ICA pairs were manually segmented and used to train an nnU-Net model, a DL segmentation framework. These segmentations were also used to develop a quantitative tool to capture the magnitude and location of the minimum distance point (MDP) between ET and ICA. Performance metrics for the nnU-Net automated segmentations were calculated via the average Hausdorff distance (AHD) and dice similarity coefficient (DSC). RESULTS: The AHD for the ET and ICA were 0.922 and 0.246 mm, respectively. Similarly, the DSC values for the ET and ICA were 0.578 and 0.884. The mean MDP from ET to ICA in the cartilaginous region was 2.6 mm (0.7-5.3 mm) and was located on average 1.9 mm caudal from the bony cartilaginous junction. CONCLUSION: This study describes the first end-to-end DL pipeline for automated ET and ICA segmentation and analyzes distances between these structures. In addition to helping to ensure the safe selection of patients for ET dilation, this method can facilitate large-scale studies exploring the relationship between ET pathologies and the 3D shape of the ET.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".