MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4396520237 · doi:10.4103/ijo.ijo_3176_23

Long anterior lens zonules in late-onset retinal degeneration

2024· article· es· W4396520237 on OpenAlexaff
Carolin Aizouki, Amit V. Mishra, Ian M. MacDonald

Bibliographic record

VenueIndian Journal of Ophthalmology - Case Reports · 2024
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldMedicine
TopicRetinal Diseases and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOphthalmologyMedicineDegeneration (medical)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 64-year-old male was evaluated for a suspected retinal dystrophy. When examined at the slit lamp, long anterior zonules (LAZs) were observed [Fig. 1a]. Posterior segment examination revealed atrophic changes in the posterior pole with corresponding areas of decreased autofluorescence on imaging [Fig. 1b and c]. A clinical diagnosis of late-onset retinal degeneration (L-ORD) was made; genetic testing revealed a pathogenic variant in the C1QTNF5 gene (c.489C>G), which confirmed the diagnosis. LAZs are zonules that extend past the lens equator and are characteristic of L-ORD.[1,2] This finding can manifest early, enabling prompt diagnosis before the development of retinal changes.Figure 1: Long anterior zonules visualized both in slit beam and retroillumination, with zonules extending to the pupillary axis (a). Color photograph of the posterior pole showing retinal degeneration (b) and corresponding autofluorescence image showing significant hypoautofluorescence in areas of degeneration (c)Declaration of patient consent The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form, the patient(s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed. Financial support and sponsorship: Nil. Conflicts of interest: There are no conflicts of interest.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.152
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.305 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIndian Journal of Ophthalmology - Case ReportsSame topicRetinal Diseases and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207