QP-LDP for Better Global Model Performance in Federated Learning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Federated learning (FL) enhanced by local differential privacy (LDP) has gained promising privacy-preserving capabilities against privacy attacks on local contributions. In this context, noise-discounting LDP methods have been widely investigated to provide better model performance and stronger privacy guarantees. However, prior art calibrate privacy guarantees by distinct LDP definitions, resulting in nonuniform privacy-preserving capabilities. In this article, aligned with the standard LDP definition, we proposed QP-LDP, a noise-discounting algorithm for FL, which can yield better model performance without any privacy loss. Specifically, QP-LDP precisely disturbs noncommon components of quantized local contributions, which are selected by an extended multiparty private set intersection process. In particular, QP-LDP can comprehensively protect two types of local contributions, i.e., local models and gradients for prevailing FedAvg and FedSGD, respectively. Through theoretical analysis, QP-LDP provides component-level indistinguishability for clients’ private local contributions and rigorous convergence guarantees for the global model. Extensive experiments on four widespread databases show that, compared to the standard LDP method, the global model prediction accuracy and convergence rate achieved by QP-LDP can be improved by up to 14.99% and 23.08%, respectively. More importantly, QP-LDP achieves the same level of privacy-preserving capabilities against privacy attacks as the standard LDP method.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.010 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".