The Origin and Evolution of Rare Earth Element Mineralization in the Muluozhai Deposit (Sichuan, China): Insights from Mineralogical, Trace Element, and Sr-Nd-Pb-C-O-Ca Isotope Data
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Carbonatite complexes are globally significant sources of rare earth elements (REEs); however, mechanisms governing REE deposition in various tectono-lithologic settings, encompassing host rocks, wall rocks, ore-controlling structures, and metasomatism, remain inadequately understood. The Zhengjialiangzi mining camp, situated within the extensive Muluozhai deposit (containing 0.45 million metric tons [Mt] at 4.0 wt % REE2O3) in the northern segment of the Mianning-Dechang belt, Sichuan (southwestern China), is characterized by a complex vein system that evolved within metamorphosed supracrustal rocks of the Yangxin and Mount Emei Formations. The mineralization is coeval with Oligocene intrusions of carbonatite and nordmarkite at ~27 Ma. The major gangue minerals include fluorite, barite (transitional to celestine), and calcite, with bastnäsite serving as the primary host for REEs in all analyzed orebodies. Several other accessory to minor minerals were identified in the ore veins, including some that had not previously been known to occur in the Muluozhai deposits (e.g., thorite and pyrochlore). The stable isotopic (C-O-Ca) and trace element compositions of calcite, along with whole-rock data, suggest that carbonate material was derived from the mantle and subsequently reequilibrated with the Yangxin marbles. The radiogenic isotope (Sr-Nd-Pb) compositions of vein material remained unaffected by wall-rock contamination and suggest a mantle source influenced by crustal recycling, consistent with other REE deposits hosted by carbonatite and nordmarkite in the region. The combined petrographic and geochemical evidence suggests derivation of Muluozhai mineralization from a carbonatitic source and interaction of carbonatite-derived fluids with wall rocks, xenoliths, and early-crystallizing mineral phases, particularly barite.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".