Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This book sets out to indigenize testimonial discourses by reading aspects of the European-based critical epistemological legacy in relation to Indigenous storytelling practices.In Canada, the Indian residential School Truth and reconciliation Commission is currently gathering the traumatic knowledge of this colonial event that existed from the midnineteenth century to the 1970s in testimonial form.Contemporary Indigenous storytelling practices provide a necessary and alternative mode of expression to surpassing the deadening silence left in the wake of this history of colonial violence.Such practices alter the representation of Indigenous peoples as the inevitable and interminable victims of colonial violence by creating literary and artistic spaces to put into words and images what has not been said or spoken before.The flexibility of Indigenous storytelling is evident from its appearance in a variety of genres and media, including novels, narrative and documentary films, performance art, theatrical and visual forms.This elasticity of location constitutes part of its strength along with its ability to weave together the separate, yet mutually intertwined, spheres of cultural and political representation.Indigenous storytelling is markedly political in how it narrates the limits and possibilities of achieving balance in political kinships that are uneven and unequal.Political kinships include relations between humans, humans and animals, humans and spirits, or humans and aspects of nature such as the land or sea.Ecologies of kinship express the desire to sustain balance and reciprocity between or among various political affiliations.Indigenous knowledges provide powerful conceptual frameworks for constructing theories of resistance in both "Western" and "non-Western" critical discourses.Indigenous theories of hospitality, for instance, underlie the nineteenth-century European conception of communism, not to
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it