Gouvernance communautaire et innovations au sein de la francophonie néobrunswickoise et ontarienne
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet ouvrage original s’inscrit dans le contexte des débats sur les rapports entre l’État et la société, en prenant pour objet les initiatives de gouvernance communautaire mises en place dans les milieux francophones du Nouveau-Brunswick et de l’Ontario depuis les années 1990 afin de mieux relever certains de leurs défis de l’heure, que ce soit dans le domaine des arts et de la culture, du développement communautaire et économique, de l’immigration francophone, de la jeunesse ou de la justice. Les réponses apportées à ces enjeux par les groupes communautaires francophones de ces deux provinces recèlent des savoirs et des enseignements importants pour bien saisir la situation des communautés francophones et leur influence sur la formulation des politiques publiques. L’ouvrage repose sur une démarche de recherche collaborative dont un des objectifs était aussi de contribuer à démocratiser la recherche vers le milieu communautaire.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.017 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".