Bibliographic record
Abstract
Écrire la quête/Écrire sur la quête De quelques usages réflexifs de la quête dans le roman québécois et français contemporain Andrée MercierLes spécialistes de la littérature française ont vu dans le « retour au récit » un moment décisif et une caractéristique déterminante de la production contemporaine.Cette idée mériterait d'être nuancée pour qualifier la littérature québécoise dans la mesure où, pour parler de retour, il faudrait d'abord que le récit ait été « empêché » pour reprendre l'expression de Dominique Viart 1 , affirmation qui ne correspond pas du tout au constat que fait, par exemple, Gilles Marcotte dans Le Roman à l' imparfait à propos du roman québécois moderne 2 .Cela dit, la traversée du discours critique sur la littérature québécoise montre que l'on reconnaît aussi l'importance des pratiques narratives au sein de la production contemporaine, dont on souligne la variété, le foisonnement et la transversalité générique 3 .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.015 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".