Bibliographic record
Abstract
À l’horizon des discussions récentes sur la laïcité et la religion dans la sphère publique se joue le lien historique et profond que la France et le Québec nouent, par-delà leurs différences, avec un catholicisme romain majoritaire. C’est dans l’analyse de ce lien, autour de la problématique « catholicisme et culture », et l’affinement nécessaire des théories de la sécularisation que réside l’apport du rassemblement des contributions qu’offre ce livre. Qu’en est-il de la prégnance, du rejet ou de l’oubli du catholicisme qui, au fil du temps, avait pénétré toutes les couches de la vie collective ? Qu’en est-il de la liaison ou de la déliaison entre catholicisme et société sous les multiples angles culturels que sont notamment les rites, les pratiques religieuses, la conception de la nation, la famille et l’éducation des enfants, le patrimoine, la mémoire et la littérature ? Les études présentées ici captiveront et éclaireront tout lecteur, qu’il soit universitaire, professionnel, étudiant ou issu du grand public.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.013 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".