MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4396557899 · doi:10.18280/ts.410233

Efficient Approach for Kidney Stone Treatment Using Convolutional Neural Network

2024· article· en· W4396557899 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Siddhesh Fuladi, Himakshi Chaturvedi, M. K. Nallakaruppan, Veena Grover, Hani Alshahrani, Mohamed Baza

Bibliographic record

VenueTraitement du signal · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicBrain Tumor Detection and Classification
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNajran University
KeywordsConvolutional neural networkComputer scienceKidney stonesArtificial intelligenceMedicineInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Kidney stone treatment is a critical task because untreated kidney stones can lead to severe pain, kidney damage, and potentially life-threatening complications such as infections and blockages of the urinary tract.The ToC (Time of Conversion) and Accuracy of Diagnosis are very low with earlier models.According to World Health Organization (WHO), every 1 in 11 people are affected by kidney stones.Current diagnostic methods face challenges in identifying the affected area and location of cysts and tumors.Elastic Net Regression (ENR), Logistic Regression (LR) and Machine Learning models are less accurate in finding the anomalies.Therefore, for the sake of future generations, it is essential to create a sophisticated kidney abnormality detection application.This research successfully presents a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) based approach for the classification of Computed Tomography (CT) kidney images into four categories: Normal, Cyst, Tumor, and Stone.The dataset, curated from different hospitals in Dhaka, Bangladesh, contains 12,446 images, with a balanced representation of Normal, Cyst, Tumor, and Stone categories.In terms of CNN architecture, our model comprises multiple convolutional layers, max-pooling layers, and fully connected layers.The convolutional layers apply learnable filters to detect patterns and features, followed by Rectified Linear Unit (ReLU) activation functions to introduce nonlinearity.Max-pooling layers downsample feature maps, enhancing computational efficiency.Fully connected layers facilitate classification by learning complex patterns.The proposed methodology leverages the power of deep learning to automate the recognition of kidney conditions, aiding radiologists in their diagnostic tasks.The methodology involves preprocessing of CT images, followed by feature extraction and classification using the CNN model.The research evaluates the approach on a curated CT kidney dataset, achieving promising results, and discusses the potential for future improvements and applications in clinical practice.In comparison to existing literature, the proposed work demonstrates significant advancements in kidney abnormality detection.The model's performance measures, including Accuracy (99.57%),F1-score (99.34%),Recall (99.56%) and Precision (99.58%), far surpass those of previous methodologies.The proposed application outperforms the methodology and competes with present models.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.572
Threshold uncertainty score0.613

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.078
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTraitement du signalSame topicBrain Tumor Detection and ClassificationFrench-language works237,207