THE COMMON RULE: HABITS OF PURPOSE FOR AN AGE OF DISTRACTION. By Justin WhitmelEarley. Downers Grove, IL: <scp>InterVarsity</scp> Press, 2019 (expanded ed., 2023). Pp. 216. Hardcover, $22.00 USD.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Earley's book covers the often difficult but desperate need for healthy, godly habits to shape our hearts, minds, and outlook on a broken world, to love God, and to love our neighbor. The problem is that we live hurried, scattered lives with our days characterized by distraction, dragged on by exhaustion, and marked by confusion as we disconnect faith from our future. The solution is a common rule of life: an inviting guide to live a life, not from rigid discipline, but from structured habits that grow and bring life, not death, to everyday living. This rule of life is eight habits: four daily and four weekly. Daily habits include kneeling prayer three times daily, one meal with others, 1 hour with the phone off, and scripture reading before the phone. The weekly habits consist of a 1-hour conversation with friends, curating media to 4 hours, fasting for 24 hours, and sabbath. Both sets of suggestions come complete with a few ideas to start practicing and other considerations. In each chapter, Earley draws on daily examples from his own life, work, and family, with theological depth, to demonstrate how the habits work and why they are so central and meaningful to everyday Christians struggling to avoid the restlessness of our culture. Limitation creates freedom and allows us to curate what we want to do and who we want to become. With devotional tact and a profound perception of the gospel's power in daily life, Christians can envision and reclaim a rule of life to rebuild their lives in love for God and others. This book serves as a great resource for Christians as parents and singles, students, professionals, and pastors who want to teach “the art of beautiful living,” as Earley masterfully writes. The book includes helpful schedules for weekly and monthly practice, written prayers, and guides for the rule of life in different stages of life (parents, creatives, entrepreneurs, etc.).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.026 | 0.013 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".