MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4396558477 · doi:10.1111/rsr.16933

FINDING PHOEBE: WHAT NEW TESTAMENT WOMEN WERE REALLY LIKE. By Susan E.Hylen. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 2023. Pp. x + 188. Paper, $19.84.

2024· article· en· W4396558477 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueReligious Studies Review · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical Gender and Feminism Studies
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPublishingTheologyHistoryArtEnvironmental ethicsPhilosophyLiterature

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hylen uses the Biblical figure Phoebe as a springboard to explore women's roles in the earliest churches. This topic is significant because it informs contemporary debates about Christian gender norms. Hylen's goal is to recreate ancient knowledge and contextualize women's roles in the early church. This involves myth-busting. Using primary documents, she shows that women owned property and authoritatively managed their affairs. They were also patrons who used their wealth and influence to promote civic and religious causes. Hylen confirms that the ancient church was not egalitarian—cultural norms upheld female inferiority. However, Hylen points out that feminine ideals were complex, permitting and even encouraging women to actively participate in their communities, even in leadership positions. The most interesting sections in this book are the chapters about female virtues. These include modesty, industriousness, loyalty, and marital harmony. Modesty was connected to selflessness. A woman could be considered modest if she promoted the needs of her family and community through patronage and leadership. Similarly, a woman celebrated for industriousness and family loyalty might have needed to leave the home to conduct business, give orders, or seek patrons to promote family interests. Virtuous people—male or female—were often silent in the presence of social superiors, though there were times when speech was appropriate. Women prayed, prophesied, and spoke out to promote political, social, and business interests. This book is designed to be an accessible resource for non-academic audiences. It contains helpful practical application sections to help readers learn about women's roles. Because this book is not meant for scholarly audiences, it lacks the detail and depth of Hylen's previous works. More citations would have been helpful for curious readers. The book is also somewhat repetitive at times. Even so, Hylen effectively highlights the complexity of ancient gender norms and challenges the idea that women were unable to do much in this period.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.110
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it