MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Continuous Auditing and Continuous Certification of Cloud Services in MEDINA – Security Auditor’s View

2024· article· en· W4396560803 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Research Europe · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCloud Data Security Solutions
Canadian institutions123 Certification (Canada)
FundersHorizon 2020 Framework ProgrammeEuropean Commission
KeywordsCertificationAuditContext (archaeology)AccountingCloud computingCertified Information Systems Security ProfessionalInformation security auditBusinessOrder (exchange)Process managementComputer scienceEngineering managementEngineeringCloud computing securityManagementFinanceEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper discusses views on continuous auditing and continuous certification of cloud services in the context of the MEDINA EU project and the security auditing industry. Based on an introduction of MEDINA, the notions of continuous auditing and continuous certification are introduced from a security auditor's perspective to discuss the opportunities and challenges related to these topics. The paper also discusses further actions beyond this project in order to provide feedback on how continuous auditing and certification can be developed and introduced to the market.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.809
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.372
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it