SharePro: an accurate and efficient genetic colocalization method accounting for multiple causal signals
Bibliographic record
Abstract
MOTIVATION: Colocalization analysis is commonly used to assess whether two or more traits share the same genetic signals identified in genome-wide association studies (GWAS), and is important for prioritizing targets for functional follow-up of GWAS results. Existing colocalization methods can have suboptimal performance when there are multiple causal variants in one genomic locus. RESULTS: We propose SharePro to extend the COLOC framework for colocalization analysis. SharePro integrates linkage disequilibrium (LD) modeling and colocalization assessment by grouping correlated variants into effect groups. With an efficient variational inference algorithm, posterior colocalization probabilities can be accurately estimated. In simulation studies, SharePro demonstrated increased power with a well-controlled false positive rate at a low computational cost. Compared to existing methods, SharePro provided stronger and more consistent colocalization evidence for known lipid-lowering drug target proteins and their corresponding lipid traits. Through an additional challenging case of the colocalization analysis of the circulating abundance of R-spondin 3 GWAS and estimated bone mineral density GWAS, we demonstrated the utility of SharePro in identifying biologically plausible colocalized signals. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: SharePro for colocalization analysis is written in Python and openly available at https://github.com/zhwm/SharePro_coloc.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".