MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4396561333 · doi:10.1542/pir.2023-006114

Ecchymotic Skin Lesions and Hand Edema in a 10-month-old Boy

2024· article· en· W4396561333 on OpenAlexaff
Caitlyn Glover, Alexander K. C. Leung, Joseph M. Lam

Bibliographic record

VenuePediatrics in Review · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChemotherapy-related skin toxicity
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of CalgaryAlberta Children's HospitalSKiN Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEdemaMedicineDermatologyEcchymosisPathologySurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 10-month-old boy presents to the emergency department with a 24-hour history of worsening targetoid papules and plaques over the face, trunk, and limbs. Some of the older lesions have become ecchymotic in appearance, and his hands are swollen. The eruption is nonpruritic and nonpainful. The patient is otherwise clinically well. There is no history of nausea, vomiting, or diarrhea. He completed a 7-day course of amoxicillin for community-acquired pneumonia, confirmed by chest radiography, the day before onset of the rash. His mother reports that she initially noticed a few pink papules on his face the day before presentation. When the lesions subsequently began to rapidly enlarge and spread to other parts of his body, she became alarmed and brought him in for assessment. His medical history is otherwise normal, and he is not taking any medications regularly. His immunizations are up to date.On examination there are multiple erythematous to violaceous targetoid plaques with purpuric changes over the face, neck, trunk, and extremities (Figs 1 and 2). The child has edema of the dorsum of the left hand (Fig 3), extending from the wrist to the metacarpophalangeal joints, as well as edema of the ear pinnae bilaterally. He does not seem to be bothered by the presence of the skin lesions. He is moving all limbs appropriately and does not have any apparent joint effusions or joint tenderness. There is no periorbital edema, conjunctivitis, or mucous membrane involvement. Coryza is noted. The child is afebrile, and there is no lymphadenopathy. Abdominal examination findings are normal. Clinical examination confirms the diagnosis.The patient has acute hemorrhagic edema of infancy (AHEI). The diagnosis can be made clinically based on the characteristic history and skin findings in an otherwise well child.AHEI is classified as a cutaneous leukocytoclastic small-vessel vasculitis. It is a rare condition, and the exact etiology is unknown. Associated triggers include upper respiratory tract infections, antibiotic use, and vaccinations. (1)(2)(3) The pathogenesis may be related to immune complex deposition in the skin. (3) AHEI generally occurs in those younger than 2 years. Despite the dramatic skin appearance, most affected children are otherwise systemically well. A low-grade fever may accompany the annular purpuric skin lesions and acral edema that are characteristic of this condition. (4)A thorough history and physical examination should allow for distinction between this benign condition and other entities, such as Henoch-Schönlein purpura (HSP), urticaria multiforme, erythema multiforme (EM), serum sickness–like reaction, and child abuse. HSP is an IgA-mediated small-vessel vasculitis that tends to occur in children aged 4 to 8 years, with a predilection for males. The clinical manifestations of HSP include arthralgias, abdominal pain, and renal involvement, which are not observed in AHEI. (5) Urticaria multiforme lesions are transient, often pruritic, erythematous, edematous plaques that last less than 24 hours and resolve without ecchymotic and/or pigmentary alteration. Dermatographism may also be apparent. (6) The administration of antihistamines results in symptomatic relief and faster resolution of urticaria multiforme lesions but has no effect on the lesions of AHEI. (6) The target lesions seen in EM are also abrupt in onset, typically triggered by herpes simplex virus infection. EM tends to occur in older children and adults, but cases of infantile EM triggered by vaccinations have been reported. (7) The acral edema characteristic of AHEI is absent in patients with EM. (8) In addition to fever and malaise, serum sickness–like reaction is commonly associated with lymphadenopathy and arthralgias, which are typically absent in AHEI. (9) The resolving lesions of AHEI are ecchymotic in nature, as shown in Fig 3. As such, if a child presents for care later in the course of the cutaneous eruption, the bruiselike lesions may be mistaken for signs of nonaccidental injury. Finally, although rare, autoinflammatory conditions such as tumor necrosis factor receptor–associated periodic syndrome should also be kept in mind as potential mimickers of AHEI. (10) Specifically, recurrent episodes of AHEI-like lesions combined with extracutaneous symptoms should prompt a diagnosis other than AHEI.An extensive evaluation is not necessary in classic cases of AHEI, as described herein. If performed, blood work results are generally nonspecific and may show leukocytosis and/or thrombocytosis with elevated inflammatory markers (C-reactive protein or erythrocyte sedimentation rate). (3) Urinalysis is typically normal. If a skin lesion is biopsied, routine histologic analysis would reveal typical findings of leukocytoclastic vasculitis (neutrophilic infiltrate/debris in the small vessels), and direct immunofluorescence is generally negative and demonstrates an absence of the IgA deposition seen in HSP. (3)The eruption typically resolves spontaneously within 3 weeks without long-term sequelae. (1) Parents should be counseled about the self-limited, benign nature of this condition that requires only supportive care. However, appropriate follow-up should be arranged to ensure that the cutaneous eruption is resolving as expected.Due to a high level of confidence in the clinical diagnosis of AHEI in this patient, no blood work or other investigations were ordered. The family was reassured about the benign, self-limited nature of the condition and the need for only supportive care. The patient was discharged with plans to follow up in the next few days. As a precaution, the family was instructed to return to the emergency department should the patient develop any additional worrisome features. At an outpatient dermatology follow-up appointment 2 days later, the child was still doing well clinically. His skin lesions were far less striking in appearance, with only some faint ecchymotic discoloration remaining (Fig 4). No recommendation to avoid amoxicillin in the future was made.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.623
Threshold uncertainty score0.690

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePediatrics in ReviewSame topicChemotherapy-related skin toxicityFrench-language works237,207