MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4396561368 · doi:10.1097/wno.0000000000002165

Preserved Ganglion Cell Analysis in a Case of Longstanding Leber Hereditary Optic Neuropathy: A Sign of Hibernating Neurons?

2024· article· en· W4396561368 on OpenAlexaff
Armin Handzic, Laura Donaldson, Edward Margolin

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neuro-Ophthalmology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMitochondrial Function and Pathology
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSign (mathematics)GanglionNeuroscienceOptic neuropathyBiologyOptic nerveMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We describe a middle-aged man with bilateral progressive visual loss over 6 months. Vision was counting fingers in each eye, and both optic discs were slightly elevated on ophthalmoscopy. MRI brain showed bilateral ovoid T2 hyperintensities within the thickened optic chiasm. Mitochondrial genome testing revealed 11,778 mutations at homoplasmy conforming Leber hereditary optic neuropathy (LHON). Despite 6-month history of visual loss, ganglion cell analysis was normal in each eye. We postulate that preservation of ganglion cell layer–inner plexiform layer (GCL–IPL) thickness might represent dormant retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) that adapted a decreased metabolic rate under adverse conditions to avoid apoptosis. A 58-year-old man noticed gradual onset of blurry vision in both eyes. Vision continued to deteriorate over the next 3 months. CT of the head was normal, and MRI of the orbits with contrast was interpreted as normal. Syphilis serology, anti-neuromyelitis optica (NMO), and anti-myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) protein antibody titers were negative. On neuro-ophthalmic examination 6 months after the onset of symptoms, vision was counting fingers in each eye with no relative afferent pupillary deficit. Ophthalmoscopy demonstrated subtle bilateral optic disc swelling (Fig. 1A). Optic coherence tomography showed mild peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickening in each eye (Fig. 1B). Ganglion cell analysis was unexpectedly normal in each eye (Fig. 1C). Formal visual fields were black in both eyes. On our review, the MRI demonstrated enlargement of the chiasm associated with striking bilateral ovoid T2 hyperintensities without contrast enhancement (Fig. 1D, E). Mitochondrial genome sequencing and anti-NMO and anti-MOG titers testing using live cell-based assay were obtained. Despite a slowly progressive course, presumptive treatment with high-dose oral prednisone with 1250 mg daily for 5 days followed by 60 mg oral taper commenced. Vision did not improve 10 days after the initiation of treatment; thus, plasma exchange commenced. Three weeks later, vision remained unchanged. NMO/MOG antibody titers returned negative. Mitochondrial genome sequencing revealed the presence of 11,778 mutations at homoplasmy, and treatment with idebenone 900 mg daily was advised. Three months later, visual function and GCL–IPL (Fig. 1F) remained unchanged.FIG. 1. A.: Fundoscopy depicting mild bilateral optic disc swelling. B. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) demonstrating bilateral mild retinal nerve fiber layer thickening. C. OCT confirming intact ganglion cell analysis 6 months after symptom onset. D. Coronal MRI brain with T2 sequence showing chiasmal enlargement and symmetric T2 hyperintensities (arrows). E. Corresponding coronal MRI brain with contrast enhanced T1 sequences without obvious enhancement.While simultaneous onset of visual loss in patients with LHON without any obvious precipitating factors for phenotypic conversion has been described,1 the most unusual part of this case was preserved thickness of GCL–IPL despite long-standing presence of visual loss due to severe bilateral optic neuropathy. It is known that GCL–IPL is measurably decreased in patients with LHON not only at the time of presentation but even in presymptomatic fellow eyes and continues to thin until it reaches the floor effect (see Supplemental Digital Content, Table 1, https://links.lww.com/WNO/A847, #1). One retrospective study assessed 14 eyes of 7 LHON patients with 12 of 14 eyes showing thinning of GCL–IPL in the acute phase within 12 weeks (see Supplemental Digital Content, Table 1, https://links.lww.com/WNO/A847, #2). Another study reported on 7 eyes with acute and 54 eyes with chronic LHON (chronicity was defined 6 months after symptoms onset) and demonstrated significant thinning of GCL–IPL in all patients with acute LHON although the exact time from symptoms onset to measurement of GCL–IPL was not reported (see Supplemental Digital Content, Table 1, https://links.lww.com/WNO/A847, #3). When comparing with other optic neuropathies such as nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION), a prospective study consisting of 16 participants showed significant thinning of GCL–IPL within the first 2 weeks from symptoms onset (see Supplemental Digital Content, Table 1, https://links.lww.com/WNO/A847, #4). Similarly, a study comparing hemispheric differences of GCL–IPL thickness in patients with presumed demyelinating optic neuritis and NAION demonstrated that loss of RGCs in both entities was visible as early as 11 days after the onset of symptoms (see Supplemental Digital Content, Table 1, https://links.lww.com/WNO/A847, #5). In addition, a prospective study of 27 patients with demyelinating optic neuritis, GCL–IPL progressively decreased over the course of 3 months, with initial thinning detectable at 1 month (see Supplemental Digital Content, Table 1, https://links.lww.com/WNO/A847, #6). This stresses the fact that RGC loss typically occurs very early in various optic neuropathies which makes this case, where GCL–IPL remained preserved despite long-standing severe visual loss in LHON, especially noteworthy. Supplemental Digital Content (see Table 1, https://links.lww.com/WNO/A847) lists studies that we identified in the literature reporting on the onset of GCL–IPL thinning in various optic neuropathies. About 70% of patients with LHON will demonstrate T2 hyperintensity and tissue enlargement along any part of the anterior visual pathway on MRI. This hyperintense signal is thought to represent gliosis.2 However, in our case, GCL–IPL was normal despite the 6-month history of visual loss. Thus, we hypothesize that T2 hyperintensities within the optic chiasm which was thickened rather than atrophic represented cellular edema due to ATP shortage and subsequent dysfunctional electrolyte membrane transporter, which would also be in keeping with preserved GCL–IPL. We subsequently postulate that under adverse conditions, RGCs in LHON might enter a dormant state with decreased metabolic rate, reflecting a coping strategy against ongoing ATP shortage to avoid apoptosis. This in turn might represent the basis for spontaneous visual recovery in some patients with LHON. The ability to enter a state of hibernation to endure a phase of increased environmental adversity is well known in the mammals. One study conducted on ground squirrels (GS) reported on RGC death in awake and hibernating GS after their optic nerve was surgically crushed.3 Intriguingly, RGC death was reported in 80% of awake GS, whereas none of the hibernating GSs demonstrated RGC death. According to the authors, this extraordinary neuronal survival in hibernating animals was associated with the lack of aggregation and activation of microglia in the retina and attributed to metabolic adaptations in the hibernating GSs. This was thought to alter the local immune response to injury and thus deter neuronal cell death. In summary, the case highlights 2 important facts: it typifies a rare presentation of LHON with slowly progressive simultaneous onset of visual loss and demonstrates that rarely GCL–IPL can remain preserved for several months after phenotypic conversion and onset of visual loss. This could reflect a hibernating state of RGC neurons, which might serve as an explanation for spontaneous visual recovery in LHON. STATEMENT OF AUTHORSHIP Conception and design: A. Handzic, L. Donaldson, E. Margolin; Acquisition of data: A. Handzic, L. Donaldson, E. Margolin; Analysis and interpretation of data: A. Handzic, L. Donaldson, E. Margolin. Drafting the manuscript: A. Handzic, L. Donaldson, E. Margolin; Revising the manuscript for intellectual content: A. Handzic, L. Donaldson, E. Margolin. Final approval of the completed manuscript: A. Handzic, L. Donaldson, E. Margolin.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.543
Threshold uncertainty score0.674

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Neuro-OphthalmologySame topicMitochondrial Function and PathologyFrench-language works237,207