MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4396573325 · doi:10.5220/0012705500003699

Contactless Physiology Radars to Promote Healthy Ageing via Remote Tracking: The Need for IoT Context

2024· article· en· W4396573325 on OpenAlexaff
Miquel Alfaras, Claus Vogelmeier, Nurlan Dauletbaev, Zouhair Haddi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNon-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)Internet of ThingsAgeingComputer scienceTracking (education)Radar trackerRadarTelecommunicationsWorld Wide WebMedicinePsychologyHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<p>In recent years, the use of high frequency radars to promote the contactless monitoring of physiology<br>parameters of cardiorespiratory nature has seen an impressive progress pushing for the creation of clinical<br>experiences beyond the telecommunications engineering field. In this position paper, we argue in favour of<br>combining the expertise of IoT and smart home research that paved the way for remote digital health in the<br>last decade, to foster a paradigm shift in healthy ageing an independent living promotion by means of<br>disruptive support technology that may overcome privacy invasiveness, discomfort, and usability issues.</p>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.355
Threshold uncertainty score0.719

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNon-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringFrench-language works237,207