Selective Initiation of Corrosion Pits in Stainless Steel Using Scanning Electrochemical Cell Microscopy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Scanning electrochemical cell microscopy is a useful technique for determining variations in corrosion behavior across a surface. However, the numerous options for experimental parameters and little understanding of their effect on the corroding system render comparisons of results between studies difficult. Herein, we explore changes in corrosion behavior of two martensitic stainless steels, a cast CA6NM and a wrought S41500, as a result of the chosen experimental parameters, including scan rate, approach potential, surface oil immersion, and tip aperture diameter. The study demonstrates that these experimental parameters can be controlled to probe oxide passivation kinetics and single pitting events by changing the surface state and cathodic currents. We measured the pitting and repassivation kinetics of a single pit and determined the compositional change of the Al 2 O 3 inclusion site initiation point. Hundreds of data points were measured within 17 h of experimental time on the stainless steel samples, allowing statistical averages of corrosion and pitting values. This work will open new avenues for fine-tuning various corrosion aspects at the microscale, thereby contributing to a deeper understanding of the corrosion processes and mechanisms of diverse materials.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".