MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4396585107 · doi:10.1111/csp2.13128

Migration, movements, and survival in a partially migratory elk ( <i>Cervus canadensis</i> ) population

2024· article· en· W4396585107 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueConservation Science and Practice · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWildlife Ecology and Conservation
Canadian institutionsTeck (Canada)
FundersHabitat Conservation Trust FoundationColumbia Basin Trust
KeywordsUngulatePredationPopulationOvergrazingBiologyEcologyGeographyCervus elaphusDemographyGrazingHabitat

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Migration provides an adaptive strategy to improve fitness by allowing individuals to exploit gradients of resources and changes in predation risk. In recent decades, the extent and prevalence of migration has declined in numerous ungulate species including many populations of elk ( Cervus canadensis ). Resident elk are often more closely associated with human activity, are more readily involved in agricultural conflicts and may contribute to overgrazing on some ranges. We evaluated migratory trends, survival rates, and causes of mortality in a partially migratory elk population in southeastern British Columbia, Canada, and compared these parameters with data from a 1982–1996 study from the same area. Analysis of 201 animal‐years ( n = 78 collared cow elk) between 2016 and 2022 showed a ratio of 52% migratory to 48% resident elk, similar to what was found during the 1982–1996 study (55% migratory to 45% resident; n = 40 cows). Among the migrants, 55% were standard migrants (traveling moderate to longer distances and changing little in elevation), 35% elevational, and 10% mixed/atypical. We detected a 14% yearly switching rate between migratory and resident strategies. We recorded 30 mortalities: 47% from human causes, predominantly elk‐vehicle/train collisions (33% of mortalities), apparent starvation/old age (17%), and predation (17%). Notably, while mortality from natural causes was similar between strategies, human‐caused mortality was nearly twice as high in resident elk. Signs of nutritional stress and lower pregnancy rates indicated potential forage limitations. Migrants had higher average survival rates (0.90) compared to residents (0.83), a shift from the 1982–1996 study that recorded higher resident survival rates (0.98), the same migrant survival rate (0.90), and fewer elk‐vehicle/train collisions. Cow elk in our study made fewer and shorter movements into upper mountain tributaries and greater use of mine properties than observed during the 1982–1996 study. Wildlife managers should consider opportunities to enhance elk forage within traditional high‐elevation summer ranges and mitigations to reduce elk‐vehicle/train collisions. Further research is needed to quantify reproductive success, monitor calf survival, and determine relative forage quality among summering areas between migratory strategies, and determine winter ranges of long‐distant migrants.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.051
Threshold uncertainty score0.992

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.003
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it