MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4396585664 · doi:10.1542/peds.2023-063064

Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia

2024· review· en· W4396585664 on OpenAlexaff
Wallace B. Wee, BreAnna Kinghorn, Stephanie D. Davis, Thomas W. Ferkol, Adam J. Shapiro

Bibliographic record

VenuePEDIATRICS · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCystic Fibrosis Research Advances
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health CentreMontreal Children's HospitalInstitute for Clinical Evaluative SciencesSickKids FoundationStollery Children's HospitalHospital for Sick Children
FundersNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteNational Institutes of HealthRare Diseases Clinical Research NetworkNational Center for Advancing Translational SciencesU.S. Department of Health and Human Services
KeywordsPrimary ciliary dyskinesiaMedicineCiliumDiseaseCiliopathiesIntensive care medicineMucociliary clearanceMotile ciliumBioinformaticsPathologyBronchiectasisPediatricsPhenotypeInternal medicineLungGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD) is a rare, genetic disease characterized by dysfunctional motile cilia and abnormal mucociliary clearance, resulting in chronic sino-oto-pulmonary disease, neonatal respiratory distress, subfertility, and organ laterality defects. Over the past 2 decades, research and international collaborations have led to an improved understanding of disease prevalence, classic and variable phenotypes, novel diagnostics, genotype-phenotype correlations, long term morbidity, and innovative therapeutics. However, PCD is often underrecognized in clinical settings and the recent analyses of genetic databases suggest that only a fraction of these patients are being accurately diagnosed. Knowledge of significant advancements, from pathophysiology to the expanded range of clinical manifestations, will have important clinical impacts. These may include increasing disease recognition, improving diagnostic testing and management, and establishing an adequate pool of affected patients to enroll in upcoming clinical therapeutic trials. The objective of this state-of-the-art review is for readers to gain a greater understanding of the clinical spectrum of motile ciliopathies, cutting-edge diagnostic practices, emerging genotype-phenotype associations, and currently accepted management of people with PCD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.390
Teacher spread0.346 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations37
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePEDIATRICSSame topicCystic Fibrosis Research AdvancesFrench-language works237,207