Deteksi Larva Cacing Pada Sapi dengan Pola Pemeliharaan yang Berbeda di Wilayah Kabupaten Sumedang
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The aim of this research is to analyze differences in levels of digestive tract worm infections in cattle with different rearing patterns in the Sumedang Regency area. The research was carried out in January 2024 in the Paseh sub-district, Sumedang Regency. Worm larvae detection examinations were carried out at the Subang Veterinary Laboratory (B-VET), Jln. Garuda Canal, Werasari Block, Dangdeur, Subang District, Kab. Subang. The method in this research is descriptive observational carried out in the field and laboratory. The technique for collecting feces samples is carried out rectally, approximately 5 grams per cow, selecting samples based on simple random sampling. Fresh feces were put into 50 ml jars along with formalin to prevent eggs from hatching during transportation and storage. Each sample is given a label that includes the sample code and age information. After that, the samples are carried using a coolbox from the sampling location until they are examined in the laboratory. The research results showed that the prevalence pattern of worm infections in semi- intensive rearing was higher than in intensive rearing. The types of worms identified are Nematoda, Trematoda and Protozoa. Different maintenance patterns (Semi-intensive and Intensive) in Paseh District are classified as mild infections (1 – 156 epg).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it