A three-dimensional phase-field model for studying the orientation-dependent interface evolution in stress-induced martensitic phase transformation
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this study, we address the challenging task of predicting the motion of interfaces in stress-driven martensitic phase transformations within shape memory alloys. The novelty of our approach lies in the introduction of a monolithically solved thermodynamic-based phase-field method, specifically tailored for large strain conditions at the nanoscale for three-dimensional problems. To achieve this, we have developed a custom finite element software seamlessly integrated into the FEniCS open-source framework, providing a sophisticated and efficient tool for the examination of nanostructure evolution. Our investigation delves into five distinct and complex scenarios under diverse loading conditions for two– and three-dimensional problems, each presenting unique challenges: (i) a straightforward uniaxial tension scenario featuring a square domain with a pre-existing martensitic nucleus; (ii) the evolution of interfaces in a square sample incorporating a circular central nanovoid under biaxial tensile stress; (iii) the analysis of a rectangular beam subjected to horizontal and vertical compressive loads; (iv) the assessment of an initially voided rectangular beam experiencing mixed loading conditions; and (v) the three-dimensional simulations of cubic-to-tetragonal phase transformation using various orientation of the habit plane. In contrast to prior studies, our analysis not only explores the standard factors of habit plane reorientation and strain transformation values but also delves into the impact of nanovoids on austenite–martensite interface evolution.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it