Comprehensive Comparative Analysis of Circular, Rectangular, and Hexagonal Coils for Wireless Charging of E-mobility
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The coil configuration is a critical element in wireless charging systems for electric vehicles (EVs). This paper presents a thorough comparison of commonly used circular, rectangular, and hexagonal coils for WPT application, specifically analyzing, reviewing, and evaluating their major electrical and physical properties. This paper includes two revised analytical models (optimized and non-optimized), Finite Element Analysis (FEA) analysis conducted on Ansys Maxwell, MATLAB Simulink results, and their experimental validation for all the coil mentioned above shapes to comprehensively compare some of their important parameters that impact the WPT system performance such as self-inductance, EMI performance, resistance, quality factor, volume, power transfer efficiency, weight, and cost. All the simulations are carried out for level 1 WPT (3.7 kW) whereas the experimental validation is performed for 2 kW.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it